Ir al contenido principal

Destacados

CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO Y MANIPULACIÓN INTELECTUAL

Hace cuatro años escribí un artículo sobre el cambio climático porque pensaba que era un tema de actualidad. Ha pasado el tiempo y hoy sigo viéndolo, en todos los medios y con cierta perplejidad, como explicación casi universal de muchos de los males de nuestra sociedad. Por eso he vuelto a aquel texto, para comprobar cómo ha envejecido. Nunca escribo para convencer a nadie de nada. Tampoco para llevar la contraria por sistema. Escribo porque, en medio de tanto ruido, tengo la sensación de que hemos dejado de detenernos a pensar. Vivimos en una sociedad cada vez más polarizada, casi de trincheras. Cuando no te posicionas con uno de los bandos, te colocan automáticamente en el contrario. Hemos trasladado el forofismo de los derbis deportivos a la vida cotidiana: eres de los nuestros o eres de los suyos. Y el cambio climático no podía ser una excepción. Ocupa hoy un lugar central en el debate público. Se habla de él en medios, instituciones y conversaciones cotidianas. Se plantea...

CLIMATE CHANGE AND INTELLECTUAL MANIPULATION

 Four years ago, I wrote an article about climate change because I thought it was a timely topic. Time has passed, and today I still see, across all media, and with a certain sense of perplexity, how climate change is presented as a near-universal explanation for many of the problems in our society. That is why I have gone back to that text, to see how it has aged.

I never write to convince anyone of anything. Nor do I write to disagree for the sake of it.

I write because, amid so much noise, I have the feeling that we have stopped taking the time to think.

We live in an increasingly polarized society, almost like opposing trenches. When you do not align yourself with one side, you are automatically placed on the other. We have brought the fanaticism of sports rivalries into our daily lives: you are either one of us or one of them.

And climate change could not be an exception. It now occupies a central place in public debate. It is discussed in the media, in institutions, and in everyday conversations. Changes to our habits and ways of living are proposed, almost always in the name of a greater cause.

And yet, we rarely ask ourselves a very simple question:

to what extent do we truly understand what we are forming opinions about?

The climate is a complex system. It always has been. We know that it changes, that it has changed, and that it will continue to change. We also know that human activity is part of that equation. But between what we know and what we believe we know, there is an important difference.

That difference is the space of thought.

In recent years, many ideas have stopped being debated and have started to be repeated instead. They are assumed, shared, and defended quickly, but not always with depth.

And perhaps that is where the issue lies.

Not in denying or affirming, but in asking ourselves whether our opinions are truly our own.

Whether they arise from our own reflection, or whether we have simply learned to repeat them and adopted them as just another trend.

It is not about being right.

It is about not giving up on thinking.

 


 


Comentarios

Entradas populares